To advance knowledge in science, it has to begin with a question.
Which leads the scientist to a hypothesis. It doesn’t mean they know the answer, though they might have a sliver of an idea of what it might be. And to find the answer to their question, it involves a series of tests, or experiments, to see if their hypothesis is correct. Maybe it’s not. And if not, they have to investigate why, see what the patterns are, what went astray.
When we think about math or science, what comes to mind are facts, formulas, and well-established truths. But what doesn’t come to mind are the questions that led to them, the trial and error and mistakes that steered the scientist and mathematician on the right path in making the discoveries that are known today.
Why is that though? Perhaps we’ve become accustomed to caring more about the solutions, the immediate answers, rather than the impetus which lead to them: questions. It is with questions that truths and facts become known. Questions lead to investigations, and investigations lead to discoveries. Thus, without questions, there would not be investigations, and without investigations, there would be no discoveries.
When we think about all of the technology that science, math, and engineering made possible, it’s easy to accept cellphones, computers, TVs, etc., for what they are, to buy and use them because they are available to us. But how did they get there? They weren’t always there, and they didn’t get there by themselves.
Didn’t it begin with people asking why something is the way it is, how to make something work, how to make something better, how to create something . . . ?